State of Newsletter Platforms
Pricing, recent changes, and platform-by-platform recommendations for newsletter operators choosing a stack in mid-2026.
- Period
- Jan–May 2026
- Platforms
- 8 tracked
- Sources
- 9 vendor pages + 23 reviews
- Cutoff
- 2026-05-28
This is an interim edition of the Letterbench Newsletter Platform Benchmark. The first full quarterly edition (Q3 2026) ships in late August and will cover the April–June 2026 quarter with full pricing-change ledger, feature parity diffs, monetization model changes, and migration trend data.
This snapshot exists because newsletter operators choosing a stack right now should not have to wait until August for sourced data they can act on today. It pulls together what we already know from the nine pillar pages on letterbench.com, organized into the same structure the quarterly editions will use. Numbers are as of 2026-05-28; anything that changed since then is noted.
01 · Five headlines that shaped 2026 so far
What changed at the platform layer between October 2025 and May 2026
1. Kit raised prices ~35% (October 2025)
The single biggest pricing shift in 18 months. Kit's Creator and Creator Pro tiers moved up across every subscriber band. For operators already on annual billing the hike landed at renewal; for new signups the new rates were live within days. The practical effect: Kit moved from the "cheaper-than-Beehiiv-above-1K-subs" position to a near-parity comparison, and the migration math now favors Beehiiv in most tiers above 5K subscribers. See: Beehiiv vs Kit.
2. Beehiiv added the Sponsorship Storefront (Max tier, Q1 2026)
Beehiiv shipped a programmatic sponsorship marketplace for Max-tier publications, with vetted sponsors and revenue-share economics. This moves Beehiiv from "pure platform" to "platform + monetization channel," and is the first material differentiator from Substack since Beehiiv launched in 2021. Practical impact is concentrated in publications above ~5K active subscribers; below that, the inventory hasn't materialized yet.
3. Substack tightened recommendation-network rules for custom domains
Publications running on a custom domain (vs.
*.substack.com) are now excluded or de-weighted in Substack's recommendation network. This is the single largest known driver of Substack's growth for new newsletters, and the new rule effectively penalizes operators who want domain ownership. It is the cleanest example yet of platform lock-in disguised as a "feature": see Beehiiv vs Substack on the recommendation-network tradeoff.4. Ghost shipped native paid memberships v2 (early 2026)
Ghost's overhauled membership system now matches Substack feature-for-feature on the paid-subscription mechanics while keeping Ghost's flat-fee model (no take rate on subscriber revenue). For operators with an audience >1,000 paid subs, the math shifts materially in Ghost's favor — at $10/mo × 1,000 paid subs, Ghost saves ~$12,000/year vs. Substack's 10% take. The catch remains: you need to host or buy Ghost(Pro), and the discovery network is non-existent.
5. Sparkloop changed payout terms for the partner network (Q2 2026)
Sparkloop tightened its partner-network attribution window and payout floors. Net effect for most operators: a small revenue cut, but easier reconciliation. The bigger story is that Sparkloop has become the de-facto cross-publication recommendation layer that Substack's network used to dominate. Operators using Beehiiv, Kit, or Ghost increasingly route discovery through Sparkloop instead of relying on platform-native recommendations.
02 · Pricing across 8 platforms at 1K–100K subscribers
Monthly cost at standard plan tier · annual billing where available · as of 2026-05-28
| Platform | 1K | 5K | 10K | 25K | 50K | 100K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beehiiv | $0 | $84 | $108 | $200 | $300 | $496 |
| Kit (Creator) | $0 | $66 | $132 | $229 | $379 | $679 |
| Substack | 10% take rate on paid subs only · free if not monetizing | |||||
| MailerLite | $0 | $39 | $73 | $169 | $289 | $489 |
| Ghost (self-hosted) | $0 platform + hosting (~$5–25/mo VPS) | |||||
| Ghost(Pro) | $11 | $50 | $90 | $199 | $249 | $399 |
| AWeber | $15 | $45 | $71 | $146 | $216 | $416 |
| Brevo (Starter) | By emails sent, not subscribers · $9/20K emails, $25/100K, $89/1M | |||||
| Mailchimp (Standard) | $20 | $75 | $135 | $320 | $510 | $830 |
Beehiiv pricing includes free-reader surcharges starting at 1,000 total subscribers; actual cost may be 10–30% higher than the table at scale if your free-subscriber count is large. Substack and Ghost (self-hosted) are not directly comparable on monthly cost because their pricing structure is take-rate or hosting-only. For interactive math at your exact subscriber count, see Newsletter Platform Pricing.
Unique data point
The Beehiiv vs Substack crossover sits at ~$5,160/year in paid-subscriber revenue. Below that, Substack's 10% take rate costs less than Beehiiv's $43/mo Scale tier. Above it, Beehiiv wins on monthly fee — but the gap widens fast (at $120K/yr in paid revenue, Substack takes ~$12,000 vs. Beehiiv's flat fee). The crossover is hidden in plain sight in both vendors' pricing pages but neither shows the math. None of the top-10 SERP listicles for "beehiiv vs substack" show this number either; we verified by reading all 10.
03 · Major changes since Q4 2025
Pricing, feature, and policy changes that affect platform decisions
| Date | Platform | Change | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | Kit | Price increase ~35% across Creator and Creator Pro tiers | More expensive |
| Q1 2026 | Beehiiv | Sponsorship Storefront launched (Max tier only) | New monetization |
| Q1 2026 | Substack | Recommendation network restricted for custom-domain publications | Penalty |
| Early 2026 | Ghost | Native paid memberships v2 | Feature parity |
| Q2 2026 | Sparkloop | Tightened payout terms + attribution window | Lower take |
| Q1 2026 | MailerLite | Tier-band pricing reorganized; effective rates roughly stable | Neutral |
| 2025–2026 | Mailchimp | Continued post-Intuit roadmap drift — no significant newsletter-creator features | Stagnation |
| Q2 2026 | Brevo | Added Conversations and TV-channel-style automation; pricing-by-emails-sent stable | Feature add |
The pattern is consistent with the multi-year trend: Beehiiv, Ghost, and Sparkloop are adding capabilities; Kit and Substack are tightening; Mailchimp and AWeber are holding position without notable forward motion. For a new operator choosing in mid-2026, momentum points toward Beehiiv for monetization-aware publications, Ghost for ownership-first publications, and a Beehiiv + Sparkloop combination for discovery-focused growth.
04 · Platform-by-platform: where each fits in 2026
One-paragraph 2026 read for each tracked platform
Beehiiv
Strongest default for operators who want monetization-aware platform + working discovery network. The pricing penalty above 25K subscribers (free-reader surcharges) is the main thing to verify against your subscriber profile before committing.
Kit (formerly ConvertKit)
Post-October-2025 the pricing argument has weakened materially. Still the strongest automation builder in the category. Best fit: operators where automation depth (sequence branching, behavioral triggers, integrations) is the binding constraint.
Substack
Strong for unknown writers who need discovery and don't mind the 10% take. The custom-domain recommendation-network penalty is the single largest signal against Substack for any operator planning long-term ownership. The take rate doesn't scale: at six figures of paid-sub revenue you are paying Substack a salary you didn't hire.
Ghost
Best ownership story in the category. Paid memberships v2 closed the feature gap with Substack. Discovery is non-existent — you bring your own audience or it stays small. Best fit: operators with an existing audience who want platform independence and no take rate.
MailerLite
Cheapest of the comparable platforms at every tier under 100K. Underrated as a starting platform. The feature surface is narrower than Beehiiv or Kit, but for operators whose primary need is "send an email to a list" the price-per-subscriber math is best-in-class.
AWeber
Long-tenured (since 1998), conservatively built, comprehensive automations. Best fit: operators migrating from another classic ESP who want continuity. Underweighted in modern listicles relative to its actual capability. Active affiliate program.
Brevo (formerly Sendinblue)
The "by emails sent, not subscribers" pricing model rewards low-frequency senders and punishes high-frequency. If you send weekly to 10K subscribers, Brevo is materially cheaper than Beehiiv. If you send daily, it isn't. Calculate before committing.
Mailchimp
Avoid for any newsletter starting in 2026. The post-Intuit roadmap has nothing for newsletter creators, the pricing is uncompetitive at scale, and the brand penalty among independent creators (collapsed since 2022) means a Mailchimp newsletter signals "not serious."
05 · Editorial recommendation by stage
What we'd actually pick for each newsletter stage in mid-2026
If you're starting from 0 readers in 2026
Substack. The discovery network does real work for unknown writers, and at 0 paid subscribers the 10% take is $0. Migrate off when you cross ~$5K/year in paid-sub revenue or want a custom domain — by that point the audience exists and the recommendation network matters less than ownership.
If you have 500–5,000 subscribers, mostly free
Beehiiv. Free tier handles 2,500 subscribers, the Sponsorship Storefront kicks in at Max-tier scale, and the migration friction off Substack at this size is moderate (15–25% paid-sub re-confirmation churn). MailerLite is a cheaper alternative if monetization isn't a priority and the audience is purely content-consumption.
If you have a sizable paid base ($10K+/yr in paid-sub revenue)
Ghost if ownership matters more than discovery and you'll route growth through Sparkloop or your own channels. Beehiiv if you want the platform-side monetization (Storefront) and don't mind the subscriber-count pricing. Substack stops making mathematical sense at this scale.
If you're an established operator considering a switch
The biggest hidden cost is the 10–25% paid-sub churn at migration (operators consistently report this; vendors don't disclose it). Leave for ownership, automation depth, or specific feature gaps. Do not leave for cost alone unless the annual savings cross five figures — the churn cost will absorb the savings for the first 12–18 months.
06 · Methodology
How this snapshot was assembled
- Primary sources: Each platform's official pricing page on 2026-05-28 is the source of truth for the pricing matrix. The full list of 9 vendor pages used is published on the underlying pillar pages (Beehiiv vs Substack, Beehiiv vs Kit, Kit vs Substack, Best Newsletter Platforms, Newsletter Platform Pricing).
- Cross-verification: Each pricing claim is cross-checked against at least two independent 2026 third-party reviews. Where reviews disagree with vendor pages, we defer to the vendor's current published terms and note the discrepancy.
- Tier interpolation: Tier breakpoints above 1,000 subscribers are taken from vendor-published anchor points (1K, 5K, 10K, 25K, 50K, 100K). Values between published anchors are interpolated. Actual pricing at intermediate counts may differ by 5–15%. Always confirm at your exact subscriber count on each vendor's pricing page before committing.
- Affiliate disclosure: Letterbench is currently a partner of Beehiiv and AWeber. Sparkloop, MailerLite, and Canva applications are in flight. We chose to recommend Beehiiv and AWeber at the subscriber tiers where the math favors them — not at all tiers. See About for full partnership terms.
- Versioning: This snapshot is Edition 0 (LB-2026-E0). The Q3 2026 full edition (Aug 2026) will be Edition 1 and will follow the same structure with full pricing-change ledger, feature parity diffs, and migration trend data.
- No paid placement. Vendors do not pay to be included, cannot influence rankings, and do not preview the report before publication.
07 · What's coming in Q3 2026 (Edition 1)
What the August full edition adds on top of this snapshot
- Full pricing-change ledger — every change, dated and sourced, for the April–June quarter
- Feature parity diff — what launched, what got deprecated, what moved between paid tiers
- Monetization model changes — take rates, payout floors, affiliate program updates
- Migration trend signals — from vendor-published growth, Reddit/Indie Hackers/Twitter discussion, and Letterbench's own subscriber surveys (begins Q4 once N is credible)
- Recommendation diffs vs Edition 0 — where this snapshot will be wrong by August and why
Reserve a copy of Edition 1 below. Subscribers get the report by email the day it ships. No paywall — the web version stays public and citable at letterbench.com/benchmark/q3-2026.
Get Edition 1 (Q3 2026) when it ships
You're reading Edition 0. Edition 1 ships late August 2026 with the full quarterly format. Subscribers get first read.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. One email when each edition ships — no weekly noise unless you opt in. Preview Edition 0 first.